Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Case necks splitting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HMFIC" data-source="post: 1633734" data-attributes="member: 7539"><p>True on the Whelen but keep in mind that Whelen cartridges are not a long tapered case and shoulder. While small, they are steep and pronounced so not really comparative to the reasons H&H decided to use the belted design.</p><p></p><p>Headspacing off the mouth is of course possible but H&H was trying to find a solution to a taper designed case for use in magazine fed rifles. Besides, if the issue was push extraction, then that means it would have only applied to double rifles and hence they would have just made it rimmed, right? Do double rifles even use the belt to extract or do they still use the extraction groove? Hatchers Notebook even says of belted designs that "<em>The rim is not high enough to give a good place for the extractor to take hold, so there is an extractor groove.</em>"</p><p></p><p>Waht is logical to me is that any ease of extraction is just a byproduct of the primary reasons which had everything to do with giving the cartridges a postive method by which to headspace and hold a large tapered cartridge in place without being wedged further forward.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HMFIC, post: 1633734, member: 7539"] True on the Whelen but keep in mind that Whelen cartridges are not a long tapered case and shoulder. While small, they are steep and pronounced so not really comparative to the reasons H&H decided to use the belted design. Headspacing off the mouth is of course possible but H&H was trying to find a solution to a taper designed case for use in magazine fed rifles. Besides, if the issue was push extraction, then that means it would have only applied to double rifles and hence they would have just made it rimmed, right? Do double rifles even use the belt to extract or do they still use the extraction groove? Hatchers Notebook even says of belted designs that "[I]The rim is not high enough to give a good place for the extractor to take hold, so there is an extractor groove.[/I]" Waht is logical to me is that any ease of extraction is just a byproduct of the primary reasons which had everything to do with giving the cartridges a postive method by which to headspace and hold a large tapered cartridge in place without being wedged further forward. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Case necks splitting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom