Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
CC workplace legal question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rod Snell" data-source="post: 915323" data-attributes="member: 796"><p>Unfortunately, the Federal courts have ruled otherwise, including SCOTUS.</p><p>I don't remember the case reference offhand, but it is available from the online archives.</p><p>If I remember correctly, it was a particularly blatant case of a person begging for protection, but the rulling was that the police (and government) are not responsible for protecting individuals.</p><p>Sucks, huh?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rod Snell, post: 915323, member: 796"] Unfortunately, the Federal courts have ruled otherwise, including SCOTUS. I don't remember the case reference offhand, but it is available from the online archives. If I remember correctly, it was a particularly blatant case of a person begging for protection, but the rulling was that the police (and government) are not responsible for protecting individuals. Sucks, huh? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
CC workplace legal question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
