CDC admits death toll is inflated! Of 161,392 deaths ONLY 6% / 9,683 ARE DIRECTLY CAUSED BY COVID.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

_CY_

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
33,848
Reaction score
6,619
Location
tulsa
D3An0cj2.png
 

_CY_

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
33,848
Reaction score
6,619
Location
tulsa
Many have asked where I got my data proving that masks do NOTHING to stop the spread of a virus (including Covid-19). Well, here is a screenshot for all you deniers. Straight from the CDC website. 2018 PDF. Conclusion highlighted. Any questions? | Graham Ledger (twitter.com)

sauce:
"We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. "
New England Journal of Medicine
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372?query=TOC

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

"There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza."




Graham Ledger

@GrahamLedger

Many have asked where I got my data proving that masks do NOTHING to stop the spread of a virus (including Covid-19). Well, here is a screenshot for all you deniers. Straight from the CDC website. 2018 PDF. Conclusion highlighted. Any questions? #MasksOffAmerica #COVID19

EhVYO0xXsAQOtwN
 

_CY_

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
33,848
Reaction score
6,619
Location
tulsa
Note April 20 date of article .. yet parts of country are still on lockdown.

The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses | April 20, 2020 | Dr. Denis G Rancourt, PhD | Signs of the Times
(www.sott.net)
https://www.sott.net/article/434796...rators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses

Abstract

Masks and respirators do not work. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.

The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

Review of the Medical Literature

Here are key anchor points to the extensive scientific literature that establishes that wearing surgical masks and respirators (e.g., "N95") does not reduce the risk of contracting a verified illness:



    • Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) "Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial", American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 - 419.
N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.



    • Cowling, B. et al. (2010) "Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: A systematic review", Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456. doi:10.1017/S0950268809991658
None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H). See summary Tables 1 and 2 therein.



    • bin-Reza et al. (2012) "The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence", Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257-267.
"There were 17 eligible studies. [...] None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask ⁄ respirator use and protection against influenza infection."



    • Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) "Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis", CMAJ Mar 2016, cmaj.150835; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150835
"We identified 6 clinical studies ... In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism."

"Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant"; as per Fig. 2c therein:

Conclusion regarding masks that do not work

No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions. Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public (more on this below).

Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit. Masks and respirators do not work.
 
Last edited:

_CY_

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
33,848
Reaction score
6,619
Location
tulsa
looks like we are making national news!!!
the hard science for masks has been laid out with actual studies for doctors, etc in this thread already.

Finally! Tulsa Docs Sue to Abandon Masks: They Claim Irrefutable Proof that They Do Not Help and Actually Cause Harm. (twitter.com)

https://ktul.com/news/local/group-files-formal-complaint-against-tulsa-over-mask-mandate

the scribd doc has been removed from scribd site.However you can read the entire document by scrolling the image of the doc in the article.The doc has cites of evidence

https://www.facebook.com/LoriFullbrightNewsOn6/posts/3457014977682794

John McAfee
@officialmcafee

First Court Case to Challenge Masks! Tulsa Doctors sue to abandon masks. They allege masks don't help the wearer or others, and they cause O2 deficiency, harming health. They claim irrefutable evidence. The Court's decision in this matter will have far reaching implications.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1303808076127047682



1-61a6584e88.jpg
 
Last edited:

Okie4570

Sharpshooter
Staff Member
Special Hen Moderator Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2010
Messages
22,980
Reaction score
24,945
Location
NWOK
looks like we are making national news!!!
the hard science for masks has been laid out with actual studies for doctors, etc in this thread already.

Finally! Tulsa Docs Sue to Abandon Masks: They Claim Irrefutable Proof that They Do Not Help and Actually Cause Harm. (twitter.com)

John McAfee
@officialmcafee

First Court Case to Challenge Masks! Tulsa Doctors sue to abandon masks. They allege masks don't help the wearer or others, and they cause O2 deficiency, harming health. They claim irrefutable evidence. The Court's decision in this matter will have far reaching implications.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1303808076127047682

The City of Enid has voted down a mask mandate 3 times now, Garfield county numbers continue to fall even after the Labor day weekend.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom