When anyone makes an extraordinary claim the burden of proof is on them. If someone says a flying saucer lands behind my house several times a year, that is an extraordinary claim. I would want to see photos, or imprints from landing gear or something similar. It is not reasonable to say you must have data proving their extraordinary claim is wrong.
Do you know anyone who wears a mask regularly who has become brain damaged as a result? It strains credulity - it is an extraordinary claim.
The video speaks to her extraordinary beliefs: Everything man-made, including the adhesive on bandaids, is a toxin and should be avoided.
As to your other post, pulse-oximetry data needs to be collected under experimentally controlled conditions, not in the way you describe.
Do you know anyone who wears a mask regularly who has become brain damaged as a result? It strains credulity - it is an extraordinary claim.
The video speaks to her extraordinary beliefs: Everything man-made, including the adhesive on bandaids, is a toxin and should be avoided.
As to your other post, pulse-oximetry data needs to be collected under experimentally controlled conditions, not in the way you describe.