Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
CDC admits death toll is inflated! Of 161,392 deaths ONLY 6% / 9,683 ARE DIRECTLY CAUSED BY COVID.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 3530775" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>This seemingly radical claim was bolstered by a paper out of Wuhan of all places, <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w" target="_blank">published by Nature.com</a>, which found no “viable virus” in PCR positive cases.</p><p></p><p>“<em>The screening of the 9,865,404 participants without a history of COVID-19 found no newly confirmed COVID-19 cases, and identified 300 asymptomatic positive cases with a detection rate of 0.303 (95 % CI 0.270–0.339)/10,000. … A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19. … Of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive again, giving a repositive rate of 0.310% (95% CI 0.423–0.574%.) Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases, indicating no “viable virus” in positive cases detected in this study.</em>”</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w#article-info" target="_blank">Published: 20 November 2020</a></li> </ul><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w" target="_blank">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w</a></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w.pdf</a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>Abstract</strong></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px">Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated. No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. 107 of 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 patients tested positive again (re-positive rate 0.31%, 95% CI 0.423–0.574%). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan was therefore very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 3530775, member: 7629"] This seemingly radical claim was bolstered by a paper out of Wuhan of all places, [URL='https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w']published by Nature.com[/URL], which found no “viable virus” in PCR positive cases. “[I]The screening of the 9,865,404 participants without a history of COVID-19 found no newly confirmed COVID-19 cases, and identified 300 asymptomatic positive cases with a detection rate of 0.303 (95 % CI 0.270–0.339)/10,000. … A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19. … Of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive again, giving a repositive rate of 0.310% (95% CI 0.423–0.574%.) Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases, indicating no “viable virus” in positive cases detected in this study.[/I]” [LIST] [*][URL='https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w#article-info']Published: 20 November 2020[/URL] [/LIST] [SIZE=6][B]Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China[/B] [B][/B] [B][URL]https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w[/URL][/B] [URL]https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w.pdf[/URL] [SIZE=5][B]Abstract[/B][/SIZE] Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated. No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. 107 of 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 patients tested positive again (re-positive rate 0.31%, 95% CI 0.423–0.574%). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan was therefore very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown. [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
CDC admits death toll is inflated! Of 161,392 deaths ONLY 6% / 9,683 ARE DIRECTLY CAUSED BY COVID.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom