Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="criticalbass" data-source="post: 1331077" data-attributes="member: 711">Any story that paints guns as the problem rather than the people behind them is another feather in the cap of the anti-gun crowd. &lt;from post by de-evoproject&gt;The story did not paint guns as the problem.&nbsp; It painted Remington as the problem.&nbsp; I&#039;m glad everyone who has posted here has always had their gun pointed in a safe direction when they switched the safety off to unload it. . .&nbsp; That&#039;s a pretty weird problem if you think about it.&nbsp; Also, Remington has basically tried to keep it a secret, so a now and then unintentional discharge is going to happen on some of the guns that require the safety to be off for the bolt to work.&nbsp; A bottom mag dump feature is good, but lots of those have blind mags, and there is still the matter of the round in the chamber.&nbsp; CBafterthought--I wonder how many deer have been scared away by an unintended shot from this problem.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="criticalbass, post: 1331077, member: 711"] [COLOR="Red"]Any story that paints guns as the problem rather than the people behind them is another feather in the cap of the anti-gun crowd.[/COLOR] <from post by de-evoproject> The story did not paint guns as the problem. It painted [I]Remington[/I] as the problem. I'm glad everyone who has posted here has always had their gun pointed in a safe direction when they switched the safety off to unload it. . . That's a pretty weird problem if you think about it. Also, Remington has basically tried to keep it a secret, so a now and then unintentional discharge is going to happen on some of the guns that require the safety to be off for the bolt to work. A bottom mag dump feature is good, but lots of those have blind mags, and there is still the matter of the round in the chamber. CB afterthought--I wonder how many deer have been scared away by an unintended shot from this problem. [/QUOTE]

Verification