Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
CNBC Attack on Remington
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="de-evoproject" data-source="post: 1331164" data-attributes="member: 14169"><p>Oh i'm with you. Yes i would be raising vocal tone, blood pressure and cane on that phone call. They would be ABSOLUTELY 100% TOTALLY WITHOUT A DOUBT <u><em>responsible for the discharge of the weapon.</em></u> </p><p></p><p>HOWEVER!!</p><p></p><p>I would be responsible for where that round landed. I keep seeing the things that look to me like the equivalent of, "Well yeah she should have been pointing in a safe direction but since its a manfacturer defect the fact that she was not practicing safety is now null and void and she is relieved of all responsibility that would normally be associated with accidentally shooting and killing another human being" </p><p></p><p>This manufacturer defect is a big part of why we practice gun safety in the first place. So that when something like this happens, no one gets hurt. If you could be 100% without a doubt certain that your gun would NEVER fire without you pulling the trigger, where would be the harm in pointing it anywhere you please as long as you don't touch the trigger?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="de-evoproject, post: 1331164, member: 14169"] Oh i'm with you. Yes i would be raising vocal tone, blood pressure and cane on that phone call. They would be ABSOLUTELY 100% TOTALLY WITHOUT A DOUBT [U][I]responsible for the discharge of the weapon.[/I][/U] HOWEVER!! I would be responsible for where that round landed. I keep seeing the things that look to me like the equivalent of, "Well yeah she should have been pointing in a safe direction but since its a manfacturer defect the fact that she was not practicing safety is now null and void and she is relieved of all responsibility that would normally be associated with accidentally shooting and killing another human being" This manufacturer defect is a big part of why we practice gun safety in the first place. So that when something like this happens, no one gets hurt. If you could be 100% without a doubt certain that your gun would NEVER fire without you pulling the trigger, where would be the harm in pointing it anywhere you please as long as you don't touch the trigger? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
CNBC Attack on Remington
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
