Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Coburn sold us out!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="n2sooners" data-source="post: 2164290" data-attributes="member: 26539"><p>Two problems I have with this. First, Harry Reid hasn't exactly been known for his straight shooting and allowing debate to actually take place. They frequently stack the deck to prevent the opposition from presenting any amendments and then have a vote to force the bill through with as little debate as possible. Second, once again a bill was voted on which practically no one has seen. How can you decide if a bill should be filibustered or brought to the floor if you haven't even seen it, let alone had time to read it? I support filibustering any bill that hasn't even been finalized and given to those who are being asked to vote for or against it.</p><p></p><p>When a bill hasn't been allowed to be seen the media can say it says anything they want it to say. Just like they are saying that the background check agreement would only require background checks on commercial sales and not personal sales which we all know has to be a lie because commercial sales on the internet and at gun shows already require background checks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="n2sooners, post: 2164290, member: 26539"] Two problems I have with this. First, Harry Reid hasn't exactly been known for his straight shooting and allowing debate to actually take place. They frequently stack the deck to prevent the opposition from presenting any amendments and then have a vote to force the bill through with as little debate as possible. Second, once again a bill was voted on which practically no one has seen. How can you decide if a bill should be filibustered or brought to the floor if you haven't even seen it, let alone had time to read it? I support filibustering any bill that hasn't even been finalized and given to those who are being asked to vote for or against it. When a bill hasn't been allowed to be seen the media can say it says anything they want it to say. Just like they are saying that the background check agreement would only require background checks on commercial sales and not personal sales which we all know has to be a lie because commercial sales on the internet and at gun shows already require background checks. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Coburn sold us out!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom