Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Coburn vs. Sotomayor
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gecko77799" data-source="post: 766572" data-attributes="member: 2589"><p>I felt the same until I heard Coburn interviewed on KTOK. He voted for it based upon TARP being used for toxic mortgage assests (which many of the banks were forced into because of pressure from ACORN and other groups-not all necessarily because the banks themselves were irresponsible) but then later TARP wasn't used for that purpose. All that voted for it were dumb leaving it up to one man(Geitner) on how to spend it. There should have been restrictions on it's allocation. I still don't think it should have been voted for either but I can understand his position.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed. I'm not a one issue voter so as most people understand it going to be near impossible to find any politician that you will agree with 100%. With that said I heavily support 2nd Amendment politicians more than any other issue because I know if we lose our 2nd Amendment rights will never get it back and we'll start losing our other rights right along with it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gecko77799, post: 766572, member: 2589"] I felt the same until I heard Coburn interviewed on KTOK. He voted for it based upon TARP being used for toxic mortgage assests (which many of the banks were forced into because of pressure from ACORN and other groups-not all necessarily because the banks themselves were irresponsible) but then later TARP wasn't used for that purpose. All that voted for it were dumb leaving it up to one man(Geitner) on how to spend it. There should have been restrictions on it's allocation. I still don't think it should have been voted for either but I can understand his position. Agreed. I'm not a one issue voter so as most people understand it going to be near impossible to find any politician that you will agree with 100%. With that said I heavily support 2nd Amendment politicians more than any other issue because I know if we lose our 2nd Amendment rights will never get it back and we'll start losing our other rights right along with it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Coburn vs. Sotomayor
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom