Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="n2sooners" data-source="post: 2162755" data-attributes="member: 26539">Is there a constitutionally protected right to a cell phone? I&#039;m thinking Obamaphone owners might think so, but I&#039;m pretty sure there isn&#039;t.I don&#039;t see how a system that would allow people who are selling without checks right now to voluntarily make a check would make FFL dealers obsolete.What&#039;s stopping someone from hacking the current system?Voting is free. The courts have already ruled on the idea of charging a fee to vote. The government shouldn&#039;t be able to charge you a fee or tax to exercise a constitutionally protected right, otherwise they could nickle and dime that right right out of reach for the average citizen. I don&#039;t think they should be able to tax firearms or ammo or charge you for background checks or any kind of carry license or require any type of insurance.They shouldn&#039;t. I was speaking of a list of those NOT allowed to own firearms.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="n2sooners, post: 2162755, member: 26539"] Is there a constitutionally protected right to a cell phone? I'm thinking Obamaphone owners might think so, but I'm pretty sure there isn't. I don't see how a system that would allow people who are selling without checks right now to voluntarily make a check would make FFL dealers obsolete. What's stopping someone from hacking the current system? Voting is free. The courts have already ruled on the idea of charging a fee to vote. The government shouldn't be able to charge you a fee or tax to exercise a constitutionally protected right, otherwise they could nickle and dime that right right out of reach for the average citizen. I don't think they should be able to tax firearms or ammo or charge you for background checks or any kind of carry license or require any type of insurance. They shouldn't. I was speaking of a list of those NOT allowed to own firearms. [/QUOTE]

Verification