Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Colburn just released his denouncement of Manchin-Toomey Proposal
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 2163346" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>I've been thinking that way too recently. Why can't I go into NICS with a name, a last 4, something, and see if an individual has a felony? I can do it in the State of Oklahoma with just a name (oscn, odcr) free of charge...why not at the federal level?</p><p></p><p>Make it open...less to hide. But then of course they'll come up with the "double secret probation" list that we still won't be able to see.</p><p></p><p>I don't, however, think that should be done as part of some background check mandate...I just think the system should be open and I should be able to use it free of charge if I choose...instead of paying a dealer to punch info into a computer to get the same info, or to call someone on the phone who will punch in the same info to tell me the same thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 2163346, member: 42"] I've been thinking that way too recently. Why can't I go into NICS with a name, a last 4, something, and see if an individual has a felony? I can do it in the State of Oklahoma with just a name (oscn, odcr) free of charge...why not at the federal level? Make it open...less to hide. But then of course they'll come up with the "double secret probation" list that we still won't be able to see. I don't, however, think that should be done as part of some background check mandate...I just think the system should be open and I should be able to use it free of charge if I choose...instead of paying a dealer to punch info into a computer to get the same info, or to call someone on the phone who will punch in the same info to tell me the same thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Colburn just released his denouncement of Manchin-Toomey Proposal
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom