Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buzzgun" data-source="post: 2403492" data-attributes="member: 4715">Passing another law that continues to allow a non elected individual or group to deny you the right of self defense based on their personal beliefs, it is NOT a step in the right direction.As the law is currently written, a college or university president could easily implement a policy that allows anyone with a CCL to carry by simply asking for a &quot;letter&quot; which could be in the form of a simple &quot;permission&quot; card that could be carried with your SDA license.&nbsp; I know of none that have done so, do you??In arguing that this new law would remove liability, you first must prove that permitting carry would actually subject the school to liability. Can you show me where a college or university is currently liable if it allows carry according to existing law??To think this law would make ANY significant progress in the ability to legally carry in such places is foolish.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buzzgun, post: 2403492, member: 4715"] Passing another law that continues to allow a non elected individual or group to deny you the right of self defense based on their personal beliefs, it is NOT a step in the right direction. As the law is currently written, a college or university president could easily implement a policy that allows anyone with a CCL to carry by simply asking for a "letter" which could be in the form of a simple "permission" card that could be carried with your SDA license. I know of none that have done so, do you?? In arguing that this new law would remove liability, you first must prove that permitting carry would actually subject the school to liability. Can you show me where a college or university is currently liable if it allows carry according to existing law?? To think this law would make ANY significant progress in the ability to legally carry in such places is foolish. [/QUOTE]

Verification