Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dale00" data-source="post: 2237163" data-attributes="member: 688">The information available is murky - that is why I was seeking input. Thanks for your post. The insurance angle does not appear to be a deal breaker. As your article states, &quot;only 300 out of 3000 counties and municipalities in Kansas have sent letters to the state attorney general seeking exemptions.&quot; Further it details some community colleges that have found insurance coverage.I have not had time to plow though the legislation itself but the discussion of it is encouraging. It appears that four years from now Kansas colleges will be able to continue to post no gun signs but only if they provide metal detectors and security at all building entrances. It seems that enough Kansas legislators understood the gun-free zone fallacy that they overruled the &quot;blood in the streets&quot; fear mongering of the anti&#039;s.I could be mistaken. If so, I welcome enlightenment.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dale00, post: 2237163, member: 688"] The information available is murky - that is why I was seeking input. Thanks for your post. The insurance angle does not appear to be a deal breaker. As your article states, "only 300 out of 3000 counties and municipalities in Kansas have sent letters to the state attorney general seeking exemptions." Further it details some community colleges that have found insurance coverage. I have not had time to plow though the legislation itself but the discussion of it is encouraging. It appears that four years from now Kansas colleges will be able to continue to post no gun signs but [U]only[/U] if they provide metal detectors and security at all building entrances. It seems that enough Kansas legislators understood the gun-free zone fallacy that they overruled the "blood in the streets" fear mongering of the anti's. I could be mistaken. If so, I welcome enlightenment. [/QUOTE]

Verification