Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
Photo Album
Colorado Places and Beauty
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 2588795" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">I've heard good things about the 70D. When we took our cruise to Alaska in 2005, I used a Nikon Coolpix 5700. On one set of photographs of some Sea Lions on the rocks, to get close to them, I had to use just about all of both optical zoom and digital zoom. My pictures were crappy. I later ran across a guy's pictures on Pbase and found that he was on the exact same cruise as we were and his photos looked good. He was using a Canon 20D with a 300mm lens. That is when I decided it was time to get back to a true single lens reflex.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">However, it took fast little grandkids to convince me that a new camera was imperative. I'd focus on the grandkid, but by the time "shutter-lag" took effect, the kid would be gone.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">However, I've also learned that good lenses are probably more important than the camera itself. I have a D300 with an 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6. That range in the f/settings causes the lens to take in less light when zoomed out. My 70-200mm f/2.8 does not darken when I zoom out as you can see in those three photos of the buck. The 24-70mm f/2.8 that I have borrowed from a nephew also does not darken. Hopefully, I may be able to get my own 24-70mm.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 2588795, member: 7900"] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3]I've heard good things about the 70D. When we took our cruise to Alaska in 2005, I used a Nikon Coolpix 5700. On one set of photographs of some Sea Lions on the rocks, to get close to them, I had to use just about all of both optical zoom and digital zoom. My pictures were crappy. I later ran across a guy's pictures on Pbase and found that he was on the exact same cruise as we were and his photos looked good. He was using a Canon 20D with a 300mm lens. That is when I decided it was time to get back to a true single lens reflex. However, it took fast little grandkids to convince me that a new camera was imperative. I'd focus on the grandkid, but by the time "shutter-lag" took effect, the kid would be gone. However, I've also learned that good lenses are probably more important than the camera itself. I have a D300 with an 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6. That range in the f/settings causes the lens to take in less light when zoomed out. My 70-200mm f/2.8 does not darken when I zoom out as you can see in those three photos of the buck. The 24-70mm f/2.8 that I have borrowed from a nephew also does not darken. Hopefully, I may be able to get my own 24-70mm. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
Photo Album
Colorado Places and Beauty
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom