Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2136563" data-attributes="member: 1132">You do know that a person can be involuntarily committed for a brief period of time (usually 24-72 hours) without being mentally incompetent or a threat, right? It&#039;s an evaluation period. I guarantee you that had she been an actual danger to herself or others, she would not have been released in 48 hours. That is an overblown witch hunt my friend. Which is why the federal law has always been explained on the 4473:She stated that she went to the facility voluntarily. She was released within 48 hours. She&#039;s had access to the guns for three months after that with no negative consequences. She ain&#039;t nuts. They shouldn&#039;t have taken her husband&#039;s guns.Nuff said. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2136563, member: 1132"] You do know that a person can be involuntarily committed for a brief period of time (usually 24-72 hours) without being mentally incompetent or a threat, right? It's an evaluation period. I guarantee you that had she been an actual danger to herself or others, she would not have been released in 48 hours. That is an overblown witch hunt my friend. Which is why the federal law has always been explained on the 4473: She stated that she went to the facility voluntarily. She was released within 48 hours. She's had access to the guns for three months after that with no negative consequences. She ain't nuts. They shouldn't have taken her husband's guns. Nuff said. :( [/QUOTE]

Verification