Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Conn. School Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dale00" data-source="post: 2019615" data-attributes="member: 688"><p>Which is more important, the 1st Amendment or the 2nd?</p><p></p><p>Freedom of speech and expression allows the production and distribution of ultra-violent movies and video games which many argue are desensitizing and training youth to become mass killers. Why are no media people or politicians arguing for restrictions on the 1st Amendment? </p><p></p><p>Freedom of the press allows the distribution of the name and image of the mass shooters, creating a kind of glorification that copy-cat murderers crave. Why are no media people or politicians arguing for restrictions on the 1st Amendment to prohibit this?</p><p></p><p>Both the 1st and 2nd Amendments are basic human rights that the founders wisely set down on paper to protect. I believe that the first amendment angle is a good arguing point against gun-control in this situation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dale00, post: 2019615, member: 688"] Which is more important, the 1st Amendment or the 2nd? Freedom of speech and expression allows the production and distribution of ultra-violent movies and video games which many argue are desensitizing and training youth to become mass killers. Why are no media people or politicians arguing for restrictions on the 1st Amendment? Freedom of the press allows the distribution of the name and image of the mass shooters, creating a kind of glorification that copy-cat murderers crave. Why are no media people or politicians arguing for restrictions on the 1st Amendment to prohibit this? Both the 1st and 2nd Amendments are basic human rights that the founders wisely set down on paper to protect. I believe that the first amendment angle is a good arguing point against gun-control in this situation. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Conn. School Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
