Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Conspiracy/False Flag - The Colorado Batman Shooting?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cinco" data-source="post: 1850592" data-attributes="member: 7656"><p>As I stated many times, my interest was drawn by the timing. Then it was the repeated and repeated references to Federal response, government services "there for you", emphasis on how "fast" response time was to the call. Officers on the scene within a minute and FBI/ATF there lickty-split. </p><p></p><p>It was just ODD - it just seemed to be slanted towards "the government is there for you in your time of need and we'll take care of you". This is what I considered fishy - it seemed like a promotion of the goverment as your protector.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, we know the saying "don't let a tragedy go to waste". So I do accept the possibility of a simple explanation (as I've stated above). </p><p></p><p>We know the Feds have many fabricated "terrorists plots" that they foil in the nick of time. Did this one get away from them? Dunno. Has it happened before? Yep.</p><p></p><p>Was the death of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry as it seemed on the surface - or result of the Fast & Furious operation? By your logic, the murder of the agent was a clear cut case of drug runner-killing-agent with no further investigation required. There is a reason to investigate incidents instead of taking them at face value - wouldn't you say? </p><p></p><p><u>IF</u> you start to look at deeper involvement by others (i.e. conspiracy), what are the motives? What would those involved have to gain? In the case of the .gov: justification for war on terror, Patriot Act, department budgets, personal/professional gain, promotion of some nefarious agenda? Who knows?</p><p></p><p>From the article:</p><p></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><strong>FBI has a track record of staging similar assaults, then stopping them at the last minute</strong>This is not your run-of-the-mill crime of passion. It was a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically advanced attack. Who might be behind all this? The FBI, of course, which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen. See four documented stories on these facts:</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html" target="_blank">http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html</a></em></p><p><em><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.html" target="_blank">http://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.html</a></em></p><p><em><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/033751_FBI_terrorism.html" target="_blank">http://www.naturalnews.com/033751_FBI_terrorism.html</a></em></p><p><em><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/035757_FBI_terror_plots_false_flag.html" target="_blank">http://www.naturalnews.com/035757_FBI_terror_plots_false_flag.html</a></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>As you soak all this in, remember that the FBI had admitted to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, staging the location of the bombings and even driving the vehicles to pull it off! This is not a conspiracy theory, it's been admitted by the FBI right out in the open. Even the New York Times openly reports all this in stories like this one:</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>NYT: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I. (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-help" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-help</a>...)</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years -- or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts. But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. ...the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving...</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Learn more: <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_James_Holmes_shooting_false_flag.html#ixzz21NgM198k" target="_blank">http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_James_Holmes_shooting_false_flag.html#ixzz21NgM198k</a></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cinco, post: 1850592, member: 7656"] As I stated many times, my interest was drawn by the timing. Then it was the repeated and repeated references to Federal response, government services "there for you", emphasis on how "fast" response time was to the call. Officers on the scene within a minute and FBI/ATF there lickty-split. It was just ODD - it just seemed to be slanted towards "the government is there for you in your time of need and we'll take care of you". This is what I considered fishy - it seemed like a promotion of the goverment as your protector. On the other hand, we know the saying "don't let a tragedy go to waste". So I do accept the possibility of a simple explanation (as I've stated above). We know the Feds have many fabricated "terrorists plots" that they foil in the nick of time. Did this one get away from them? Dunno. Has it happened before? Yep. Was the death of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry as it seemed on the surface - or result of the Fast & Furious operation? By your logic, the murder of the agent was a clear cut case of drug runner-killing-agent with no further investigation required. There is a reason to investigate incidents instead of taking them at face value - wouldn't you say? [U]IF[/U] you start to look at deeper involvement by others (i.e. conspiracy), what are the motives? What would those involved have to gain? In the case of the .gov: justification for war on terror, Patriot Act, department budgets, personal/professional gain, promotion of some nefarious agenda? Who knows? From the article: [I] [B]FBI has a track record of staging similar assaults, then stopping them at the last minute[/B]This is not your run-of-the-mill crime of passion. It was a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically advanced attack. Who might be behind all this? The FBI, of course, which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen. See four documented stories on these facts: [url]http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html[/url] [url]http://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.html[/url] [url]http://www.naturalnews.com/033751_FBI_terrorism.html[/url] [url]http://www.naturalnews.com/035757_FBI_terror_plots_false_flag.html[/url] As you soak all this in, remember that the FBI had admitted to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, staging the location of the bombings and even driving the vehicles to pull it off! This is not a conspiracy theory, it's been admitted by the FBI right out in the open. Even the New York Times openly reports all this in stories like this one: NYT: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I. ([url]http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-help[/url]...) THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years -- or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts. But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. ...the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving... Learn more: [url]http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_James_Holmes_shooting_false_flag.html#ixzz21NgM198k[/url][/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Conspiracy/False Flag - The Colorado Batman Shooting?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
