Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Constitutional Carry (SB 1212) on the OK House floor 4/23
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="p238shooter" data-source="post: 3113424" data-attributes="member: 24583"><p>I still think (and hope) because this is a "controversial" item, she will take the Bills in order, not make anything special one way or the other and when it comes up in line, just sign it. Like many here, many of the Anti's have backed off the heat of the moment and are just on hold and will go with the flow.</p><p></p><p>Only the hard core ones are still participating on both sides. In a couple days "Oh yea, constitutional carry got past also along with a bunch of other boring stuff." will be on the news. Well, not really, this will get special coverage so people know to wear their rubber boots for "blood in the streets" type comments. Most of us will continue the SDA permitting system to travel to other states. Someday we might all get together and get reciprocity on some of those. JMO</p><p></p><p>I wonder how the average LEO that stops what might be an average Joe looking guy that has a loaded firearm in his seat or is found somehow will know whether that average Joe looking guy is legal to have it or not without a NCIS check? They might have to add or rename another category of "Not Allowed" in their computer database that brings up tag numbers like they have for the ones that do have SDA licenses.</p><p></p><p>Myself, I intend to flip mine out with my DL like usual (yes a few times) just to hope help him feel comfortable. I may get a speeding ticket I deserve, but I appreciate all they do. Not a job I would consider for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="p238shooter, post: 3113424, member: 24583"] I still think (and hope) because this is a "controversial" item, she will take the Bills in order, not make anything special one way or the other and when it comes up in line, just sign it. Like many here, many of the Anti's have backed off the heat of the moment and are just on hold and will go with the flow. Only the hard core ones are still participating on both sides. In a couple days "Oh yea, constitutional carry got past also along with a bunch of other boring stuff." will be on the news. Well, not really, this will get special coverage so people know to wear their rubber boots for "blood in the streets" type comments. Most of us will continue the SDA permitting system to travel to other states. Someday we might all get together and get reciprocity on some of those. JMO I wonder how the average LEO that stops what might be an average Joe looking guy that has a loaded firearm in his seat or is found somehow will know whether that average Joe looking guy is legal to have it or not without a NCIS check? They might have to add or rename another category of "Not Allowed" in their computer database that brings up tag numbers like they have for the ones that do have SDA licenses. Myself, I intend to flip mine out with my DL like usual (yes a few times) just to hope help him feel comfortable. I may get a speeding ticket I deserve, but I appreciate all they do. Not a job I would consider for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Constitutional Carry (SB 1212) on the OK House floor 4/23
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom