Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Court upholds police pointing gun at lawful carrier
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Baron Driver" data-source="post: 945561" data-attributes="member: 748"><p>Mr. Attorney probably ran into the local "Bad Apple" and, being a typical attorney (I can stereotype my own profession on here, right?) was not afraid of informing Mr. Bad Apple that he knew his rights. Whether or not he was repsectful, I have no idea. Based on the officer's actions, I'm guessing he was a tad less than polite.</p><p></p><p>That being said, once the officer found a facially valid license (couldn't he run the guy's permit and determine if it was valid? They can in AR), he should let the citizen go. Perhaps this officer was picked on too much in elementary school... perhaps the lawyer was too.</p><p></p><p>If this really is as simple as it appears in the article, then I would not settle for anything less than a public apology from the officer himself.</p><p></p><p>Anyone know if he got his firearm and ammo back? I've heard that many departments will not return ammo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Baron Driver, post: 945561, member: 748"] Mr. Attorney probably ran into the local "Bad Apple" and, being a typical attorney (I can stereotype my own profession on here, right?) was not afraid of informing Mr. Bad Apple that he knew his rights. Whether or not he was repsectful, I have no idea. Based on the officer's actions, I'm guessing he was a tad less than polite. That being said, once the officer found a facially valid license (couldn't he run the guy's permit and determine if it was valid? They can in AR), he should let the citizen go. Perhaps this officer was picked on too much in elementary school... perhaps the lawyer was too. If this really is as simple as it appears in the article, then I would not settle for anything less than a public apology from the officer himself. Anyone know if he got his firearm and ammo back? I've heard that many departments will not return ammo. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Court upholds police pointing gun at lawful carrier
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom