Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Covid Scam
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="okcBob" data-source="post: 4349669" data-attributes="member: 45783"><p>You’re making a medical claim based on grounds of temporal succession. That’s a logical fallacy. Correlation doesn’t imply causation. Did you ever take statistics & probability?</p><p></p><p>With the fire example, there is enough additional evidence to support the causal conclusion, but you don’t have the same level of evidence to support the IVM story. So, you’re making a pseudo-scientific argument, using a common logical fallacy.</p><p></p><p>By your logic: While you are watching OU football, you notice that every time you go to the kitchen, the opposing team scores. That’s what you’re basing your Covid theory on. For you to be proven correct, you would need to do a test with a lot of people who tested positive with Covid, then give them either IVM or a placebo (unknown to the patient & researcher) and 100% of those who got the IVM would be cured within 12 hrs while the others didn’t.</p><p></p><p>Again: there is no cure for Covid. IVM has some limited benefit, but it’s not a cure.</p><p>People took IVM right away when sick & they still died. If it was a “cure” they wouldn’t have died.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="okcBob, post: 4349669, member: 45783"] You’re making a medical claim based on grounds of temporal succession. That’s a logical fallacy. Correlation doesn’t imply causation. Did you ever take statistics & probability? With the fire example, there is enough additional evidence to support the causal conclusion, but you don’t have the same level of evidence to support the IVM story. So, you’re making a pseudo-scientific argument, using a common logical fallacy. By your logic: While you are watching OU football, you notice that every time you go to the kitchen, the opposing team scores. That’s what you’re basing your Covid theory on. For you to be proven correct, you would need to do a test with a lot of people who tested positive with Covid, then give them either IVM or a placebo (unknown to the patient & researcher) and 100% of those who got the IVM would be cured within 12 hrs while the others didn’t. Again: there is no cure for Covid. IVM has some limited benefit, but it’s not a cure. People took IVM right away when sick & they still died. If it was a “cure” they wouldn’t have died. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Covid Scam
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom