Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Crazy Talk
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roadkill Coyote" data-source="post: 2798336" data-attributes="member: 13568"><p>The three Ms was just a way of breaking the problem down into components. As I said before, attacking the last one is the one that can't work regardless, so no, to repeat myself again, I am not calling for or supporting taking away guns. But I do believe that the way we define who is prohibited for mental incapacity is going to change, and we need to find a objective standard, before someone manages to get a non-objective one passed. If you don't like the idea of a proscription standard, or the scope of the idea that I threw out, then how would you find the people that are falling through the cracks. The folks that would have been confined previously, but are now on the street heavily medicated? Or are you satisfied with the current state of the mental health system?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roadkill Coyote, post: 2798336, member: 13568"] The three Ms was just a way of breaking the problem down into components. As I said before, attacking the last one is the one that can't work regardless, so no, to repeat myself again, I am not calling for or supporting taking away guns. But I do believe that the way we define who is prohibited for mental incapacity is going to change, and we need to find a objective standard, before someone manages to get a non-objective one passed. If you don't like the idea of a proscription standard, or the scope of the idea that I threw out, then how would you find the people that are falling through the cracks. The folks that would have been confined previously, but are now on the street heavily medicated? Or are you satisfied with the current state of the mental health system? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Crazy Talk
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom