Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Sports
Dallas Crowboys
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoonerP226" data-source="post: 4343192" data-attributes="member: 26737"><p>Part of it was injuries, but the turnovers were killers. If Dak doesn’t throw that first INT in the end zone, it’s very possible that the Cowboys take the lead, and it becomes a very different ballgame. I think the Lions scored off of every Dallas turnover, and they had five. Two of them were INTs in the end zone, so that’s a 28-point swing right there. Dak’s INT in the second half was very nearly a pick six, returned inside the five. </p><p></p><p>It was not a pretty game, not at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoonerP226, post: 4343192, member: 26737"] Part of it was injuries, but the turnovers were killers. If Dak doesn’t throw that first INT in the end zone, it’s very possible that the Cowboys take the lead, and it becomes a very different ballgame. I think the Lions scored off of every Dallas turnover, and they had five. Two of them were INTs in the end zone, so that’s a 28-point swing right there. Dak’s INT in the second half was very nearly a pick six, returned inside the five. It was not a pretty game, not at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Sports
Dallas Crowboys
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom