Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Dan Wesson 1911 worth the $
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Veritas" data-source="post: 4219206" data-attributes="member: 55012"><p>So revolvers for a long time back in the day could be ordered with the sights regulated to be point of aim point of impact for specific loads. Most people don't shoot well enough to know why this matters but when you are shooting bulls at 25 or 50 yards it does.</p><p></p><p>The new "Ultimate Carry" J Frame Lipsey's is putting out for Smith and Wesson has gone back to this with sights made for a specific modern load/round offering.</p><p></p><p>As you can imagine a 110 grain .357 magnum round and a much heavier wadcutter in .38 Special out of the same gun would not hit in the same place at a given distance.</p><p></p><p>Again if you took 99% of people out at 5 yards and had them shoot a 1" paster they would miss either because of poor shooting skills but just as likely they literally don't know where their sights are regulated. Will the round hit behind the front sight in line with the dot or on top of the sight like a lillipop? Some guns even changed at distance. For example Gen 3 Glocks had an issue with shooting high at 25 yards because of how much and how early the barrel would tilt up so it was not uncommon to use a 6 o'clock hold at that distance to hit center. The Gen 5's seem to be better and more mechanically accurate overall.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Veritas, post: 4219206, member: 55012"] So revolvers for a long time back in the day could be ordered with the sights regulated to be point of aim point of impact for specific loads. Most people don't shoot well enough to know why this matters but when you are shooting bulls at 25 or 50 yards it does. The new "Ultimate Carry" J Frame Lipsey's is putting out for Smith and Wesson has gone back to this with sights made for a specific modern load/round offering. As you can imagine a 110 grain .357 magnum round and a much heavier wadcutter in .38 Special out of the same gun would not hit in the same place at a given distance. Again if you took 99% of people out at 5 yards and had them shoot a 1" paster they would miss either because of poor shooting skills but just as likely they literally don't know where their sights are regulated. Will the round hit behind the front sight in line with the dot or on top of the sight like a lillipop? Some guns even changed at distance. For example Gen 3 Glocks had an issue with shooting high at 25 yards because of how much and how early the barrel would tilt up so it was not uncommon to use a 6 o'clock hold at that distance to hit center. The Gen 5's seem to be better and more mechanically accurate overall. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Dan Wesson 1911 worth the $
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom