Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Defense Attorney Critical...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 1566572" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>defense knew about all the lies Ersland spouted before trial. this is assuming Ersland had specific instructions from defense to STFU and kept right on spouting lies. defense HAD to know Ersland was his own worst enemy. </p><p></p><p>IMHO incompetence came from not doing basic research to refute what ME had stated in writing before trial. </p><p></p><p>If defense had spent 1 hour .. that's right 1 hour using google... they would have found LOADS of documentation on time of death. And how it's all but impossible to determine time of death, with anything but the broadest of strokes. </p><p></p><p>with above knowledge defense would had an air tight case ... </p><p></p><p>since it's impossible to prove if thug is alive or death 30 seconds after first shot. NO one will ever know if thug was alive or death at time of 5 additional shots. </p><p></p><p>a man should NOT be convicted of murder1 if there's ANY doubt remaining. sorry but this includes scumbags like Ersland... the guilty verdict should be vacated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 1566572, member: 7629"] defense knew about all the lies Ersland spouted before trial. this is assuming Ersland had specific instructions from defense to STFU and kept right on spouting lies. defense HAD to know Ersland was his own worst enemy. IMHO incompetence came from not doing basic research to refute what ME had stated in writing before trial. If defense had spent 1 hour .. that's right 1 hour using google... they would have found LOADS of documentation on time of death. And how it's all but impossible to determine time of death, with anything but the broadest of strokes. with above knowledge defense would had an air tight case ... since it's impossible to prove if thug is alive or death 30 seconds after first shot. NO one will ever know if thug was alive or death at time of 5 additional shots. a man should NOT be convicted of murder1 if there's ANY doubt remaining. sorry but this includes scumbags like Ersland... the guilty verdict should be vacated. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Defense Attorney Critical...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom