Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Defense Attorney Critical...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 1566686" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>it's impossible to determine time of death within 30 seconds, it just cannot be done. </p><p>NO one will ever know with 100% certainty thug was alive or dead at time of five additional shots. </p><p></p><p>a beating heart is not the legal definition of death ... testimony is already on record from ME that involuntary muscle movements are possible after death. don't think anyone will dispute it's possible for heart to beat 30 seconds after being brain dead. which is the definition of death. </p><p></p><p>Ersland's insistence that downed thug was still alive and a threat is yet another lie. look at his actions in the video, the downed thug was no longer a threat. Ersland only believable defense is you cannot kill a dead person. </p><p></p><p>since NO one will ever know if downed thug was alive or dead... this permanently puts doubt on jury's guilty verdict.</p><p></p><p>there's many precedents of using DNA or other forensic evidence to exonerate death sentences. this is after falsely admitting to the crime. so the fact that someone incriminates themselves. then gets exonerated afterwards by forensic evidence is not new.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 1566686, member: 7629"] it's impossible to determine time of death within 30 seconds, it just cannot be done. NO one will ever know with 100% certainty thug was alive or dead at time of five additional shots. a beating heart is not the legal definition of death ... testimony is already on record from ME that involuntary muscle movements are possible after death. don't think anyone will dispute it's possible for heart to beat 30 seconds after being brain dead. which is the definition of death. Ersland's insistence that downed thug was still alive and a threat is yet another lie. look at his actions in the video, the downed thug was no longer a threat. Ersland only believable defense is you cannot kill a dead person. since NO one will ever know if downed thug was alive or dead... this permanently puts doubt on jury's guilty verdict. there's many precedents of using DNA or other forensic evidence to exonerate death sentences. this is after falsely admitting to the crime. so the fact that someone incriminates themselves. then gets exonerated afterwards by forensic evidence is not new. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Defense Attorney Critical...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom