Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Defense Department Spending Cuts
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ByrdC130" data-source="post: 1990997" data-attributes="member: 4993"><p>It would be a nice thought to think that wars could just be fought with hi-tech gizmonitry and big long range guns that go boom. But, the reality played out in Desert Storm and to the wars today, you can big boom the crap out of your enemy but unless you kill every single one of them, you still have to have the boots on the ground to secure said ground. Even in Viet Nam the massive B-52 strikes didn't kill that many VC, they dug underground and when the bombs stopped, they went about their business.</p><p></p><p>The weapons of war change, but the fundamentals of war rarely change. But, after seeing the US mil think it has changed the fundamentals of war and not realize that it really hasn't changed, it doesn't suprise me to hear someone else blow and go about leaner meaner quick strike forces. Same was said right after Desert Storm and numbers of troops dropped because we'd never fight another war of occupation. So let's see, we've had large forces in Iraq & Afghanistan for how long. Oh, so multiple deployments aren't that big a deal...Jeeze I want to cuss right now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ByrdC130, post: 1990997, member: 4993"] It would be a nice thought to think that wars could just be fought with hi-tech gizmonitry and big long range guns that go boom. But, the reality played out in Desert Storm and to the wars today, you can big boom the crap out of your enemy but unless you kill every single one of them, you still have to have the boots on the ground to secure said ground. Even in Viet Nam the massive B-52 strikes didn't kill that many VC, they dug underground and when the bombs stopped, they went about their business. The weapons of war change, but the fundamentals of war rarely change. But, after seeing the US mil think it has changed the fundamentals of war and not realize that it really hasn't changed, it doesn't suprise me to hear someone else blow and go about leaner meaner quick strike forces. Same was said right after Desert Storm and numbers of troops dropped because we'd never fight another war of occupation. So let's see, we've had large forces in Iraq & Afghanistan for how long. Oh, so multiple deployments aren't that big a deal...Jeeze I want to cuss right now. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Defense Department Spending Cuts
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom