Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Dems route to gun control/confiscation according to Pelosi
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 3205283" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"></li> </ul><p>Her only legal action would be to draft Articles of Impeachment.</p><p></p><p></p><p>People need to remember that the Supreme Court is a separate but EQUAL branch of the government. I point this out because constitutionally, the Judicial Branch really doesn't have a dog in this fight. It should never see the inside of a court. It's inarguable that the Administrative Branch has broad powers to declare a national emergency. If the Legislative Branch considers such an alleged abuse of power to be unconstitutional, then they have the duty to draft Articles of Impeachment, after which the Senate must convict the President by a supermajority of votes (67 of 100 in this case). If they fail to do so, the President may continue to act within the powers vested in the Administrative Branch by the Constitution.</p><p> </p><p>I realize that everyone assumes the Judicial Branch has the power to immediately nullify any decision the Administrative Branch makes, but it simply isn’t true. In specific cases such as this, he may simply ignore those Judicial Branch edicts and carry on. After all, he is the one who has authority over the people who could actually intervene. Until he’s impeached, tried and convicted, no one else can stop it.</p><p></p><p>I'm not happy with how this is playing out, but at this point I think it's time to cowboy the **** up, channel TR and Andrew Jackson, and get the job finished.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 3205283, member: 1132"] [LIST][B][/B] [/LIST] Her only legal action would be to draft Articles of Impeachment. People need to remember that the Supreme Court is a separate but EQUAL branch of the government. I point this out because constitutionally, the Judicial Branch really doesn't have a dog in this fight. It should never see the inside of a court. It's inarguable that the Administrative Branch has broad powers to declare a national emergency. If the Legislative Branch considers such an alleged abuse of power to be unconstitutional, then they have the duty to draft Articles of Impeachment, after which the Senate must convict the President by a supermajority of votes (67 of 100 in this case). If they fail to do so, the President may continue to act within the powers vested in the Administrative Branch by the Constitution. I realize that everyone assumes the Judicial Branch has the power to immediately nullify any decision the Administrative Branch makes, but it simply isn’t true. In specific cases such as this, he may simply ignore those Judicial Branch edicts and carry on. After all, he is the one who has authority over the people who could actually intervene. Until he’s impeached, tried and convicted, no one else can stop it. I'm not happy with how this is playing out, but at this point I think it's time to cowboy the **** up, channel TR and Andrew Jackson, and get the job finished. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Dems route to gun control/confiscation according to Pelosi
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
