Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Do we need still need the "press"?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 3007985" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>Even when more speech is a complete and utter lie? In your own post you're perpetuating an untruth. "The consensus is that AGW is real" is utilized by partisan political operatives and "enterprising" people and entities to make obscene profits, frequently off the backs of taxpayers. By exposing one of the most virulent AGW proponents as a fraud, it puts a significant dent in their enterprise.</p><p></p><p>Smart people will admit GACC is real, while categorically rejecting that it's significant enough to spend TRILLIONS of dollars in other people's money, until science proves beyond a reasonable doubt what percentage of overall GCC is anthropomorphic, and what percentage of that percentage is attributable to each country. Actual independently unverified proof, not poorly supported hypotheses using manipulated data and "peer review" from ideologically aligned supporters . <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p>Besides, I'm not talking about researchers and pols, I'm talking about media broadcasters falsely holding themselves out as journalism while spreading lies, untruths and innuendo as "fact".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 3007985, member: 1132"] Even when more speech is a complete and utter lie? In your own post you're perpetuating an untruth. "The consensus is that AGW is real" is utilized by partisan political operatives and "enterprising" people and entities to make obscene profits, frequently off the backs of taxpayers. By exposing one of the most virulent AGW proponents as a fraud, it puts a significant dent in their enterprise. Smart people will admit GACC is real, while categorically rejecting that it's significant enough to spend TRILLIONS of dollars in other people's money, until science proves beyond a reasonable doubt what percentage of overall GCC is anthropomorphic, and what percentage of that percentage is attributable to each country. Actual independently unverified proof, not poorly supported hypotheses using manipulated data and "peer review" from ideologically aligned supporters . :( Besides, I'm not talking about researchers and pols, I'm talking about media broadcasters falsely holding themselves out as journalism while spreading lies, untruths and innuendo as "fact". [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Do we need still need the "press"?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom