Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Surveyor1653" data-source="post: 2774973" data-attributes="member: 5197"><p>You seem fixated on the notion that without a bunch of SDA instructors running around waiving our magic CLEET wands, somehow the whole state and, more specifically, its chirren are somehow in mortal peril from a bunch of mouth breathers. That's foolish and shortsighted at best. The 7-hours of instruction isn't going to make up for someone's piss poor marksmanship that might cause said bystander to die. Leave little Susie and Jimmie out of it. The "class" is to familiarize with the concepts of safe handling and the law, as well as to demonstrate that someone can make a gun go "bang" 50 times without shooting themselves, their fellow students or us. It is not intended to, nor will it ever, replicate nor replace real firearms training. That's the class. If you're including some kind of instruction above and beyond what CLEET has mandated under their statutory requirement (as so many are want to point out in their defense of keeping the class as a requirement to carry) then guess what? That's <em>not the class</em>. That's something you've added to the CLEET mandated minimum level of instruction and you're not going to fit both into a single day and have any tangible effect toward saving Susie or Jimmie. You can teach that content <em>without</em> there being a mandated course of instruction and because people <em>want</em> to take the class, not because they're checking a box.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's probably best.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Surveyor1653, post: 2774973, member: 5197"] You seem fixated on the notion that without a bunch of SDA instructors running around waiving our magic CLEET wands, somehow the whole state and, more specifically, its chirren are somehow in mortal peril from a bunch of mouth breathers. That's foolish and shortsighted at best. The 7-hours of instruction isn't going to make up for someone's piss poor marksmanship that might cause said bystander to die. Leave little Susie and Jimmie out of it. The "class" is to familiarize with the concepts of safe handling and the law, as well as to demonstrate that someone can make a gun go "bang" 50 times without shooting themselves, their fellow students or us. It is not intended to, nor will it ever, replicate nor replace real firearms training. That's the class. If you're including some kind of instruction above and beyond what CLEET has mandated under their statutory requirement (as so many are want to point out in their defense of keeping the class as a requirement to carry) then guess what? That's [I]not the class[/I]. That's something you've added to the CLEET mandated minimum level of instruction and you're not going to fit both into a single day and have any tangible effect toward saving Susie or Jimmie. You can teach that content [I]without[/I] there being a mandated course of instruction and because people [I]want[/I] to take the class, not because they're checking a box. That's probably best. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom