Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2775161" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>ProBusiness,</p><p></p><p>You would train and license every creature out there who has a built in self defense mechanism? Creatures with fangs, horns, beaks, tusks, massive bulk, poison, stink, camouflage, speed, flight, stingers, etc. etc.? We have our brains and have created the defense mechanisms we need. You would deny us our defense mechanisms if we don't comply with whatever training you feel is necessary. </p><p></p><p>Maybe we should all walk around with a full length shield. A shield might stop bullets, but without shooting back and neutralizing the threat, the bullets will just keep on coming. Why require training that will delay or even prevent a person employing self defense? You condemn such people to death before their life is even threatened.</p><p></p><p>It is obvious that many more people who are disarmed are murdered than armed people. Arming people saves lives. Arming untrained people will also save lives. People are intelligent and can figure out how to use things without training. Lack of training doesn't automatically mean a weapon will be used improperly or unlawfully. </p><p></p><p>Cavemen used spears and rocks to survive. Unga and Trog never had to get a license from the elders to protect the tribe or bring home the brontosaurus. Nowadays it's knives, bow and arrows, and guns. Some of us still have to hunt to bring home the bacon. You would deny those people the right to feed themselves simply for the lack of a piece of paper saying they received training?</p><p></p><p>Woody</p><p></p><p>PS: Don't forget the Second Amendment, either. "Shall not be infringed," is quite simple, easy to understand, and about as absolute a statement as you can get.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2775161, member: 745"] ProBusiness, You would train and license every creature out there who has a built in self defense mechanism? Creatures with fangs, horns, beaks, tusks, massive bulk, poison, stink, camouflage, speed, flight, stingers, etc. etc.? We have our brains and have created the defense mechanisms we need. You would deny us our defense mechanisms if we don't comply with whatever training you feel is necessary. Maybe we should all walk around with a full length shield. A shield might stop bullets, but without shooting back and neutralizing the threat, the bullets will just keep on coming. Why require training that will delay or even prevent a person employing self defense? You condemn such people to death before their life is even threatened. It is obvious that many more people who are disarmed are murdered than armed people. Arming people saves lives. Arming untrained people will also save lives. People are intelligent and can figure out how to use things without training. Lack of training doesn't automatically mean a weapon will be used improperly or unlawfully. Cavemen used spears and rocks to survive. Unga and Trog never had to get a license from the elders to protect the tribe or bring home the brontosaurus. Nowadays it's knives, bow and arrows, and guns. Some of us still have to hunt to bring home the bacon. You would deny those people the right to feed themselves simply for the lack of a piece of paper saying they received training? Woody PS: Don't forget the Second Amendment, either. "Shall not be infringed," is quite simple, easy to understand, and about as absolute a statement as you can get. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom