Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2780884" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>That's right. Concealed is concealed, permit or not. </p><p></p><p>Maybe they are more concerned with abiding the Constitution than to capitulate to unconstitutional acts of law. That doesn't mean they are not concerned and just carry anyway. The only reason I got a permit was to avoid the hassles of being caught carrying without the unconstitutional requirement to have a permit. </p><p></p><p>If a judge agrees that the requirements TallPrairie mentioned are constitutional is a prime example of how far off track said judge is from the Constitution. "Shall not be (whatever word you wish to insert)," means, "Don't do it." </p><p></p><p>Insert the word "murdered." "Human Beings shall not be murdered." Are there any restrictions - what someone might consider to be reasonable - that would be appropriate to be placed upon that prohibition on murder?</p><p></p><p>The Second Amendment is law that is above all other law any legislature might create. Regardless of the efficacy of any learning and practical training such as I took for my own benefit, none of it can be made a prerequisite to keep and bear arms.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2780884, member: 745"] That's right. Concealed is concealed, permit or not. Maybe they are more concerned with abiding the Constitution than to capitulate to unconstitutional acts of law. That doesn't mean they are not concerned and just carry anyway. The only reason I got a permit was to avoid the hassles of being caught carrying without the unconstitutional requirement to have a permit. If a judge agrees that the requirements TallPrairie mentioned are constitutional is a prime example of how far off track said judge is from the Constitution. "Shall not be (whatever word you wish to insert)," means, "Don't do it." Insert the word "murdered." "Human Beings shall not be murdered." Are there any restrictions - what someone might consider to be reasonable - that would be appropriate to be placed upon that prohibition on murder? The Second Amendment is law that is above all other law any legislature might create. Regardless of the efficacy of any learning and practical training such as I took for my own benefit, none of it can be made a prerequisite to keep and bear arms. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom