Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Does "30-round clip" really mean ALL firearms with a detatchable magazine?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flybeech" data-source="post: 2078679" data-attributes="member: 7557"><p>I threw the "clip" reference in there in an effort to make a joke, along with my real question. The intent of my question wasn't the old clip v magazine yarn, so please let me try asking another way that is hopefully more easily understood, omitting the word "clip" from the question, to alleviate confusion.</p><p></p><p>When politicians tell us we don't need firearms that can accept a high-capacity magazines, are they REALLY telling us we shouldn't be allowed to possess ANY firearm with a detachable magazine, since any firearm with a bottom-feeding, detachable magazine, can be fitted with a magazines holding more than a certain amount of rounds?</p><p></p><p>For example, if I have a Glock 27 sub-compact pistol that is factory equipped with a 9 round magazine, but can be fitted in seconds with an evil 32 round magazine, doesn't it seem reasonable that the government would consider that an "assault weapon" since without any modifications and the press of a button, the Glock is suddenly transformed into a high-capacity weapon worthy of banning and confiscation?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flybeech, post: 2078679, member: 7557"] I threw the "clip" reference in there in an effort to make a joke, along with my real question. The intent of my question wasn't the old clip v magazine yarn, so please let me try asking another way that is hopefully more easily understood, omitting the word "clip" from the question, to alleviate confusion. When politicians tell us we don't need firearms that can accept a high-capacity magazines, are they REALLY telling us we shouldn't be allowed to possess ANY firearm with a detachable magazine, since any firearm with a bottom-feeding, detachable magazine, can be fitted with a magazines holding more than a certain amount of rounds? For example, if I have a Glock 27 sub-compact pistol that is factory equipped with a 9 round magazine, but can be fitted in seconds with an evil 32 round magazine, doesn't it seem reasonable that the government would consider that an "assault weapon" since without any modifications and the press of a button, the Glock is suddenly transformed into a high-capacity weapon worthy of banning and confiscation? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Does "30-round clip" really mean ALL firearms with a detatchable magazine?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom