Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Does the .22-250 have enough power?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SDarkRage" data-source="post: 2583103" data-attributes="member: 3492"><p>**I've never shot a 22-250, so take this with a grain of salt**</p><p></p><p>Out of curiosity, why not go with a .243 Winchester? That was my first deer rifle and I was 12 when I got my first one. To this day, the .243 is my favorite round. Stupid fast and wide selection of bullets to tailor to fit your needs. Not much recoil and plenty of commercial ammo available. Enlighten me on why you would use a 22-250? Seems like the 22-250 is very critical for shot placement from what you guys are saying. No offense to the child here, but it would seem like that would be an unfavorable round to a younger shooter who maybe a little less concerned with critical shot placement. A slightly stronger round that is more forgiving with better power for general take down. (Caveat - all shot placement is critical for ethical harvesting). Let's say the child misses a couple inches fore or aft with a 22-250, the deer runs off and bleeds out somewhere farther off where you can't find it. You've wasted that life. If same shot hits with the .243 the deer drops way faster and easily recoverable due to more hydraulic pressure from the speed and power.</p><p></p><p>**once again, I've never shot or hunted with a 22-250, so this is me pontificating**</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SDarkRage, post: 2583103, member: 3492"] **I've never shot a 22-250, so take this with a grain of salt** Out of curiosity, why not go with a .243 Winchester? That was my first deer rifle and I was 12 when I got my first one. To this day, the .243 is my favorite round. Stupid fast and wide selection of bullets to tailor to fit your needs. Not much recoil and plenty of commercial ammo available. Enlighten me on why you would use a 22-250? Seems like the 22-250 is very critical for shot placement from what you guys are saying. No offense to the child here, but it would seem like that would be an unfavorable round to a younger shooter who maybe a little less concerned with critical shot placement. A slightly stronger round that is more forgiving with better power for general take down. (Caveat - all shot placement is critical for ethical harvesting). Let's say the child misses a couple inches fore or aft with a 22-250, the deer runs off and bleeds out somewhere farther off where you can't find it. You've wasted that life. If same shot hits with the .243 the deer drops way faster and easily recoverable due to more hydraulic pressure from the speed and power. **once again, I've never shot or hunted with a 22-250, so this is me pontificating** [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Does the .22-250 have enough power?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom