Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Dog meds cure cancer?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3230065" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>Because, like you, they read exactly what the report wanted you to read and didn't read the actual data. The report you are talking about (and I discussed this with many doctors as well) had the title "Popular ecig flavorings <strong>may</strong> impair lung function". They also followed up with "the chemical diacetyl, which is linked to popcorn lung disease, is found in many popular ecig flavorings". By those two lines millions claimed, just as you did, that vaping causes popcorn lung. Had you, and those doctors, nurses, general public had actually read the study you would have found that the <strong>amount</strong> of diacetyl found was way under the exposure experienced by smokers. And if you had done due diligence and looked up popcorn lung you would have found the only people who have been diagnosed with this disease were factory workers that were around artificial butter flavorings for microwave popcorn. The amount of diacetyl they breathed in was vastly more than even in cigarette smoke. </p><p></p><p>Its articles like this that scare the general public and are used to sway the unknowing against vaping. Look at how many articles like that are used by the gun grabbers. Stop, think and study. Every single study that has been produced that painted ecigs in a bad light as been blasted in peer review or proven to have been done incorrectly. For instance the formaldehyde scare. That study said ecigs produced 10x the amount vs smoking. Once reviewed it was shown the researchers were using the ecig equipment wrong and were burning the silica wicks, which produced the formaldehyde. Even in the study, when used correctly, the ecig produced 0 traceable amounts of formaldehyde. </p><p></p><p>Is it no wonder that Public Health England, the same body that warned us smoking was bad 20 years before the surgeon general did, has stated that vaping is at <strong>least</strong> 95% safer than smoking? So why are there so many articles in the US saying its not? Follow the money trail. It always leads back to big pharmaceutical companies. Smokers are their cash cows. Between their ineffective stop smoking aids (don't even get me started on Chantix) to COPD, emphysema, and cancer, they make way too much money on smokers to allow vaping to wipe them out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3230065, member: 43724"] Because, like you, they read exactly what the report wanted you to read and didn't read the actual data. The report you are talking about (and I discussed this with many doctors as well) had the title "Popular ecig flavorings [B]may[/B] impair lung function". They also followed up with "the chemical diacetyl, which is linked to popcorn lung disease, is found in many popular ecig flavorings". By those two lines millions claimed, just as you did, that vaping causes popcorn lung. Had you, and those doctors, nurses, general public had actually read the study you would have found that the [B]amount[/B] of diacetyl found was way under the exposure experienced by smokers. And if you had done due diligence and looked up popcorn lung you would have found the only people who have been diagnosed with this disease were factory workers that were around artificial butter flavorings for microwave popcorn. The amount of diacetyl they breathed in was vastly more than even in cigarette smoke. Its articles like this that scare the general public and are used to sway the unknowing against vaping. Look at how many articles like that are used by the gun grabbers. Stop, think and study. Every single study that has been produced that painted ecigs in a bad light as been blasted in peer review or proven to have been done incorrectly. For instance the formaldehyde scare. That study said ecigs produced 10x the amount vs smoking. Once reviewed it was shown the researchers were using the ecig equipment wrong and were burning the silica wicks, which produced the formaldehyde. Even in the study, when used correctly, the ecig produced 0 traceable amounts of formaldehyde. Is it no wonder that Public Health England, the same body that warned us smoking was bad 20 years before the surgeon general did, has stated that vaping is at [B]least[/B] 95% safer than smoking? So why are there so many articles in the US saying its not? Follow the money trail. It always leads back to big pharmaceutical companies. Smokers are their cash cows. Between their ineffective stop smoking aids (don't even get me started on Chantix) to COPD, emphysema, and cancer, they make way too much money on smokers to allow vaping to wipe them out. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Dog meds cure cancer?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
