Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Donald Trump: I’ll Sign National Reciprocity if It Reaches My Desk
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rez Exelon" data-source="post: 3443792" data-attributes="member: 5800"><p>You understand that I'm not the person you are fighting right? I'm just the guy that is making a point that fixing a symptom is not fixing a problem. Especially when we didn't really "fix" anything to start with. </p><p></p><p>For all the talk in your post about "absolute, inalienable and protected" and TDoug's post about the Constitution being supreme, we've passed away from that --- it's a fantasy nowadays. Next time you buy from a dealer look at the 4473 and remember it's an infringement. Next time you don't want to sell to a felon, remember that not doing so in an infringement on them. Next time you can't go to Walmart and buy full-auto, remember that is an infringement. Next time you can't add a can without a Form 1 or 4, you guessed it, that's an infringement. </p><p></p><p>And yet, oddly, that's law and people are abiding by it. Should you not like it, work against that. Work against it for alllllll you are worth, and try to do it WITHOUT adding more Constitutional issues on top of it which is what an imposition of national reciprocity would be. Not even driver's licenses are mandated at a federal level. That's a compact amongst the states.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rez Exelon, post: 3443792, member: 5800"] You understand that I'm not the person you are fighting right? I'm just the guy that is making a point that fixing a symptom is not fixing a problem. Especially when we didn't really "fix" anything to start with. For all the talk in your post about "absolute, inalienable and protected" and TDoug's post about the Constitution being supreme, we've passed away from that --- it's a fantasy nowadays. Next time you buy from a dealer look at the 4473 and remember it's an infringement. Next time you don't want to sell to a felon, remember that not doing so in an infringement on them. Next time you can't go to Walmart and buy full-auto, remember that is an infringement. Next time you can't add a can without a Form 1 or 4, you guessed it, that's an infringement. And yet, oddly, that's law and people are abiding by it. Should you not like it, work against that. Work against it for alllllll you are worth, and try to do it WITHOUT adding more Constitutional issues on top of it which is what an imposition of national reciprocity would be. Not even driver's licenses are mandated at a federal level. That's a compact amongst the states. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Donald Trump: I’ll Sign National Reciprocity if It Reaches My Desk
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom