Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Drew Peterson, Hearsay, and Confrontation
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Billybob" data-source="post: 1896113" data-attributes="member: 1294"><p>[Drew Peterson, the former Illinois police officer who gained notoriety after his much-younger wife vanished in 2007, was convicted Thursday of murdering a previous wife in a case centered on secondhand hearsay statements from both women.</p><p></p><p>The trial was the first of its kind in Illinois history, <strong>with prosecutors building their case largely on hearsay thanks to a new law, dubbed "Drew's Law," tailored to Peterson's case.</strong> <strong>That hearsay, prosecutors had said, would let his third and fourth wives "speak from their graves" through family and friends to convict Peterson.]</strong></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/crimblog/2012/09/drew-peterson-hearsay-and-conf.html" target="_blank">http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/crimblog/2012/09/drew-peterson-hearsay-and-conf.html</a></p><p></p><p>I can't help but think of a post the other day in another thread by Dave70968</p><p></p><p>"Due process exists for a reason. If you abandon it even once, you establish a precedent that eventually will reach yourself."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Billybob, post: 1896113, member: 1294"] [Drew Peterson, the former Illinois police officer who gained notoriety after his much-younger wife vanished in 2007, was convicted Thursday of murdering a previous wife in a case centered on secondhand hearsay statements from both women. The trial was the first of its kind in Illinois history, [B]with prosecutors building their case largely on hearsay thanks to a new law, dubbed "Drew's Law," tailored to Peterson's case.[/B] [B]That hearsay, prosecutors had said, would let his third and fourth wives "speak from their graves" through family and friends to convict Peterson.][/B] [url]http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/crimblog/2012/09/drew-peterson-hearsay-and-conf.html[/url] I can't help but think of a post the other day in another thread by Dave70968 "Due process exists for a reason. If you abandon it even once, you establish a precedent that eventually will reach yourself." [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Drew Peterson, Hearsay, and Confrontation
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom