Druryj I found the one up to your cute walther.

[HoLeChit]

https://www.gunsamerica.com/9705011...-TO-HAVE-BEEN-ISSUED-TO-ADOLF-HITLER-WW-I.htm

The big AH’s bolt action apparently, with no proof other than an all caps shoddy description. What say ye @druryj?

 

[HoLeChit]

I’m just saying, if I had a $900k rifle, I wouldn’t be laying it across the Adirondacks in the back yard for a picture.

 

[El Pablo]

It has AH under the buttstock. What more proof does one need

 

[dennishoddy]

No frigging way......

 

[druryj]

Agreed. No friggin' way. but this... hard to top. VERY rare Walther PPK-L in 7.65 MM (.32ACP)...now, that's another story. It's as new, except it dates back to 1966. Beautiful finish. Flawless functioning.

 

[MilitantBEEMER]

It has AH under the buttstock. What more proof does one need

Don’t forget the exceptional condition.... $900K is a steel, literally.

 

[druryj]

I'll add this; none of my Walthers have any Nazi Proofs or markings of any kind. I only buy post-war/pre-US-made PPK and PPK/S pistols with the exception of one; an Interarms stainless PPK/S in .32acp.

 

[HoLeChit]

Oh and for the record @druryj thatvrifle is worth about 18 million rounds of 22LR.

 

[El Pablo]

I'll add this; none of my Walthers have any Nazi Proofs or markings of any kind. I only buy post-war/pre-US-made PPK and PPK/S pistols with the exception of one; an Interarms stainless PPK/S in .32acp.

Yeah, me personally, while I'd understand the historical importance... I'd just feel creepy buying anything or owning anything with Nazi proofs

 

[El Pablo]

Yeah, me personally, while I'd understand the historical importance... I'd just feel creepy buying anything or owning anything with Nazi proofs

well, I may make an exception for a Sturmgewehr 44 or FG 42, but I’d still feel creepy and dirty.