Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Effective .380 ammo
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Duck L&#039;Orange" data-source="post: 2826341" data-attributes="member: 7814"><p>I've seen this one. Those were fml, if I remember correctly.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day, I know I can compromise with fmj and have it be 100% reliable with consistently more than adequate penetration. But I'd rather carry modern HP, if possible.</p><p></p><p>I wonder how caliberz with even worse reputations like .32 or .25 cap would've done with ball ammo? I feel like the .32 would have similar results, of course with a slightly bigger hole in .380....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Duck L'Orange, post: 2826341, member: 7814"] I've seen this one. Those were fml, if I remember correctly. At the end of the day, I know I can compromise with fmj and have it be 100% reliable with consistently more than adequate penetration. But I'd rather carry modern HP, if possible. I wonder how caliberz with even worse reputations like .32 or .25 cap would've done with ball ammo? I feel like the .32 would have similar results, of course with a slightly bigger hole in .380.... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Effective .380 ammo
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
