Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Effective .380 ammo
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="druryj" data-source="post: 2831647" data-attributes="member: 10465"><p>Yes. Dunno if it's true, but when I used to carry a Walther PPK/S, I carried Fiocchi 95 gr. FMJ in it. Why? Cause it ran flawlessly with it and I was fine with the round's effectiveness as long as I did my part. Some evidence points to FMJ giving much better penetration than. JHP in .380...and some doesn't. YMMV. Carry the round that your little .380 shoots best and be done with it. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="druryj, post: 2831647, member: 10465"] Yes. Dunno if it's true, but when I used to carry a Walther PPK/S, I carried Fiocchi 95 gr. FMJ in it. Why? Cause it ran flawlessly with it and I was fine with the round's effectiveness as long as I did my part. Some evidence points to FMJ giving much better penetration than. JHP in .380...and some doesn't. YMMV. Carry the round that your little .380 shoots best and be done with it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Effective .380 ammo
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
