Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Election
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dru" data-source="post: 1345335" data-attributes="member: 3047"><p>Mostly its because I absolutely will not vote for Askins, and I just really can't stomach Fallin. She's a sellout IMO. i can't forget the fact that she voted for the bailout and therefore did not have the courage to stand up for principle. The fact she did that demonstrates to me that she will cave under pressure and not show the leadership that this state will need in the near future. People who will stand firmly on principle will be crucial as some states begin to fight against a burgeoning federal government and she has demonstrated that she lacks that ability.</p><p></p><p>By the same token, if I vote for her, given my opposition to her based on my own principles, then I effectively am a hypocrite for requiring of her the very thing which I would lack via my action of voting for her and "caving" just because she is the lesser of two evils or, as I like to say "sucks less"</p><p></p><p>Both parties know that most people will hold their nose and eventually vote for one candidate or the other. THey therefore have no real incentive to run candidates too far out of their own ideological comfort zone. The only way to break that is to convince them that if they don't put up the right candidates, then they may well lose the election on that candidate due to lack of voter interest on that side.</p><p></p><p>I hope that explains somewhat why I am considering voting tomorrow, but not for the governor's office specifically.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dru, post: 1345335, member: 3047"] Mostly its because I absolutely will not vote for Askins, and I just really can't stomach Fallin. She's a sellout IMO. i can't forget the fact that she voted for the bailout and therefore did not have the courage to stand up for principle. The fact she did that demonstrates to me that she will cave under pressure and not show the leadership that this state will need in the near future. People who will stand firmly on principle will be crucial as some states begin to fight against a burgeoning federal government and she has demonstrated that she lacks that ability. By the same token, if I vote for her, given my opposition to her based on my own principles, then I effectively am a hypocrite for requiring of her the very thing which I would lack via my action of voting for her and "caving" just because she is the lesser of two evils or, as I like to say "sucks less" Both parties know that most people will hold their nose and eventually vote for one candidate or the other. THey therefore have no real incentive to run candidates too far out of their own ideological comfort zone. The only way to break that is to convince them that if they don't put up the right candidates, then they may well lose the election on that candidate due to lack of voter interest on that side. I hope that explains somewhat why I am considering voting tomorrow, but not for the governor's office specifically. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Election
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom