Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Preppers' Corner
Emp
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Belthos" data-source="post: 2162761" data-attributes="member: 24944"><p>Building a nuke is one thing, little boy weighed about 4 1/2 tons.</p><p>Building an accurate missile/launch system is another..</p><p>One that North Korea doesn't play in.</p><p></p><p>They would have to reduce the weight and scale the size to fit within the nose cone of a missile.</p><p>Their satellite which is reportedly spinning out of control weighs 100 kilograms.</p><p></p><p>220 pounds vs roughly 9000 pounds means the ability to put a small piece of junk into orbit doesn't directly translate into the ability to place a multi ton object up there to rain terror down on anyone below.</p><p>The current best estimates indicate,</p><p>If they manage to build a small enough nuke.</p><p>If they can get the rocket to work. Several of theirs exploded on the pad and shortly after launch.</p><p>If they can control the destination over thousands of miles.</p><p>Their current generation rocket could strike most of.......</p><p>Alaska.</p><p></p><p>Nuking Alaska would be mostly pointless.</p><p></p><p>They land one nuke.</p><p>They learn the exact meaning of hell on earth when they are annihilated.</p><p></p><p>Conservatives will demand their destruction for violating our sovereignty.</p><p>Liberals will demand their destruction for killing the seals, polar bears and melting the pristine snow somewhere in the wilderness of Alaska.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Belthos, post: 2162761, member: 24944"] Building a nuke is one thing, little boy weighed about 4 1/2 tons. Building an accurate missile/launch system is another.. One that North Korea doesn't play in. They would have to reduce the weight and scale the size to fit within the nose cone of a missile. Their satellite which is reportedly spinning out of control weighs 100 kilograms. 220 pounds vs roughly 9000 pounds means the ability to put a small piece of junk into orbit doesn't directly translate into the ability to place a multi ton object up there to rain terror down on anyone below. The current best estimates indicate, If they manage to build a small enough nuke. If they can get the rocket to work. Several of theirs exploded on the pad and shortly after launch. If they can control the destination over thousands of miles. Their current generation rocket could strike most of....... Alaska. Nuking Alaska would be mostly pointless. They land one nuke. They learn the exact meaning of hell on earth when they are annihilated. Conservatives will demand their destruction for violating our sovereignty. Liberals will demand their destruction for killing the seals, polar bears and melting the pristine snow somewhere in the wilderness of Alaska. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Preppers' Corner
Emp
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom