Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Empirical Evidence for AR Supremacy ???
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 891118" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>I was just gonna say - "experience with ARs in combat" is probably going to limit who can even comment about this to very few folks who still own ARs. </p><p></p><p>I know several folks who were issued M4s or had AR patrol rifles and as soon as they got out of Law Enforcement or the military, they didn't want much to do with them.</p><p></p><p>How about instead of experience with ARs in combat, you go with a set amount of use (i.e. carried through rough terrain, shot more than 1000rds at a session, used roughly because of necessity, exposed to elements, checked for accuracy, etc...).</p><p></p><p>This is a good premise for a fairly cool science project of sorts - I'd love to see several tests done (strictly by users' experience) to see which manufacturer's stuff will hold up to some rough use with or without the extra testing.</p><p></p><p>Part of the problem with going by individual users' experience is that with batch testing, there is a wide variation of experiences available with that particular manufacturer (several problems could be missed, while several good ARs could be floating around out there).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 891118, member: 229"] I was just gonna say - "experience with ARs in combat" is probably going to limit who can even comment about this to very few folks who still own ARs. I know several folks who were issued M4s or had AR patrol rifles and as soon as they got out of Law Enforcement or the military, they didn't want much to do with them. How about instead of experience with ARs in combat, you go with a set amount of use (i.e. carried through rough terrain, shot more than 1000rds at a session, used roughly because of necessity, exposed to elements, checked for accuracy, etc...). This is a good premise for a fairly cool science project of sorts - I'd love to see several tests done (strictly by users' experience) to see which manufacturer's stuff will hold up to some rough use with or without the extra testing. Part of the problem with going by individual users' experience is that with batch testing, there is a wide variation of experiences available with that particular manufacturer (several problems could be missed, while several good ARs could be floating around out there). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Empirical Evidence for AR Supremacy ???
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom