Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Eric Holder can't explain constitutional basis for Obama's executive orders
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 2396880" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>Much of the uproar over Barry's executive orders and his alleged usurpation of Congress is overblown. Read the EOs. They are narrow in scope and in almost every case they exercise real authority given the Executive branch by the text of the legislation.</p><p></p><p>For example, the EOs revolving around the Affordable Care Act are perfectly legal because the legislation is full of the the phrase "Such as the Secretary may decide/determine". The Secretary works for the President, the President can direct her, through and EO, to decide/determine how he wants.</p><p></p><p>If anyone is to blame for Barry's EO-fest, it's Congress for writing those back doors into the legislation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 2396880, member: 42"] Much of the uproar over Barry's executive orders and his alleged usurpation of Congress is overblown. Read the EOs. They are narrow in scope and in almost every case they exercise real authority given the Executive branch by the text of the legislation. For example, the EOs revolving around the Affordable Care Act are perfectly legal because the legislation is full of the the phrase "Such as the Secretary may decide/determine". The Secretary works for the President, the President can direct her, through and EO, to decide/determine how he wants. If anyone is to blame for Barry's EO-fest, it's Congress for writing those back doors into the legislation. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Eric Holder can't explain constitutional basis for Obama's executive orders
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
