Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Execution or defending his home? You make the call
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="10Seconds" data-source="post: 2001787" data-attributes="member: 24432"><p>What they look like does not matter a bit. You can find good pictures of anyone. Good looking criminals are still criminals. The question is whether they deserved to be shot (and killed) or not. There is no question that these two committed a crime (breaking in) and intended to commit additional crime(s) (whether just burglary or assault, etc, we dont know) </p><p></p><p>If this guy had put them down in one shot as they came down the stairs would anyone be condemning this guy? I think not. </p><p></p><p>As a side note, if he had just killed the first one and let the second live after shooting to stop them, the surviving criminal would be guilty of felony murder for him killing the first one. </p><p></p><p>As I posted earlier, what the guy ended up doing was wrong, but it really bugs me when the media puts out these innocent looking pictures of the criminal looking like regular kids, and then repeatedly shows the victims arrest mug shot. Like the Treyvon Martin shooting, media showed an innocent looking kid picture over and over (even though it was way out dated and there were current pictures online he had posted but that made him look, um, more 'urban'?) while at the same time showing the other guys mug shot over and over again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="10Seconds, post: 2001787, member: 24432"] What they look like does not matter a bit. You can find good pictures of anyone. Good looking criminals are still criminals. The question is whether they deserved to be shot (and killed) or not. There is no question that these two committed a crime (breaking in) and intended to commit additional crime(s) (whether just burglary or assault, etc, we dont know) If this guy had put them down in one shot as they came down the stairs would anyone be condemning this guy? I think not. As a side note, if he had just killed the first one and let the second live after shooting to stop them, the surviving criminal would be guilty of felony murder for him killing the first one. As I posted earlier, what the guy ended up doing was wrong, but it really bugs me when the media puts out these innocent looking pictures of the criminal looking like regular kids, and then repeatedly shows the victims arrest mug shot. Like the Treyvon Martin shooting, media showed an innocent looking kid picture over and over (even though it was way out dated and there were current pictures online he had posted but that made him look, um, more 'urban'?) while at the same time showing the other guys mug shot over and over again. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Execution or defending his home? You make the call
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom