Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Facebook bans 'voice of Trump' from platform
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wawazat" data-source="post: 3551914" data-attributes="member: 35603"><p>I will agree that every trend has an expiration date. Watching the news, political debates, social media debates, personal discussions I have had with people that have a different opinion, etc., I think we are losing the emphasis on intelligent discourse. We are seeing a huge increase in emotionally driven disagreements where the person that screams their emotional outcries the loudest is seen as the moral victor. It is no longer accepted by a large number of people that two people can intelligently disagree on a topic and neither be wrong. The issue with that is it takes a lot of effort, mental strength, and emotional discipline to engage in that type of discussion. A lot of folks prefer to take the easy way out and resort to personal attacks and assigning names to the other person labelling them as the next Hitler, or a snowflake, or a redneck bigot, or a libtard.</p><p></p><p>I will openly admit I often have many of these thoughts go through my head when I am reading through news stories, watching interviews, or reading posts on the Internet. I do try to curb myself before those thoughts become weaponized and leave my mouth though. At the end of the day, there is nothing that builds more respect for a person than being able to intelligently disagree with someone and find a common point where we can each at least appreciate the other person's perspective. Some see that as a slippery slope to caving into the opposition. I see it as gaining additional tools and understanding to have an even more persuasive discussion the next time it comes up. Maybe, just maybe, I can win one or two over to see why their way may not be the only way and make another ally in the process.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wawazat, post: 3551914, member: 35603"] I will agree that every trend has an expiration date. Watching the news, political debates, social media debates, personal discussions I have had with people that have a different opinion, etc., I think we are losing the emphasis on intelligent discourse. We are seeing a huge increase in emotionally driven disagreements where the person that screams their emotional outcries the loudest is seen as the moral victor. It is no longer accepted by a large number of people that two people can intelligently disagree on a topic and neither be wrong. The issue with that is it takes a lot of effort, mental strength, and emotional discipline to engage in that type of discussion. A lot of folks prefer to take the easy way out and resort to personal attacks and assigning names to the other person labelling them as the next Hitler, or a snowflake, or a redneck bigot, or a libtard. I will openly admit I often have many of these thoughts go through my head when I am reading through news stories, watching interviews, or reading posts on the Internet. I do try to curb myself before those thoughts become weaponized and leave my mouth though. At the end of the day, there is nothing that builds more respect for a person than being able to intelligently disagree with someone and find a common point where we can each at least appreciate the other person's perspective. Some see that as a slippery slope to caving into the opposition. I see it as gaining additional tools and understanding to have an even more persuasive discussion the next time it comes up. Maybe, just maybe, I can win one or two over to see why their way may not be the only way and make another ally in the process. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Facebook bans 'voice of Trump' from platform
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom