Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Fallin vetoes another gun bill?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buzzgun" data-source="post: 2746423" data-attributes="member: 4715"><p>Did you guys read "paragraph 4 of subsection B of Section 1277" of the SDA??</p><p></p><p>It says "Any property designated by a city, town, county, or state, governmental authority as a park, recreational area, or fairgrounds; provided nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to authorize any entry by a person in possession of a concealed or unconcealed handgun into any structure, building, or office space which is specifically prohibited by the provisions of subsection A of this section."</p><p></p><p>If you fill in the blanks, you find that SB41 would still allow a property owner, tenant, employer, place of worship or business entity to prohibit any person from carrying a concealed or unconcealed firearm on the property, <strong>unless</strong> the property is designated by a city, town, county, or state, governmental authority as a park, recreational area, or fairgrounds.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line, it would prevent private entities from renting/leasing public areas, that are open to concealed or open carry, and declaring them off limits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buzzgun, post: 2746423, member: 4715"] Did you guys read "paragraph 4 of subsection B of Section 1277" of the SDA?? It says "Any property designated by a city, town, county, or state, governmental authority as a park, recreational area, or fairgrounds; provided nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to authorize any entry by a person in possession of a concealed or unconcealed handgun into any structure, building, or office space which is specifically prohibited by the provisions of subsection A of this section." If you fill in the blanks, you find that SB41 would still allow a property owner, tenant, employer, place of worship or business entity to prohibit any person from carrying a concealed or unconcealed firearm on the property, [B]unless[/B] the property is designated by a city, town, county, or state, governmental authority as a park, recreational area, or fairgrounds. Bottom line, it would prevent private entities from renting/leasing public areas, that are open to concealed or open carry, and declaring them off limits. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Fallin vetoes another gun bill?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
