Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="J.P." data-source="post: 18084" data-attributes="member: 6">I think you missed my point...We are certainly *all* welcome to disagree publicly.I&#039;m not satisfied that &quot;public good&quot; was a good term either...&quot;civil discourse&quot;?Anyway,there&#039;s a difference in stating why you disagree with someone and asking them to qualify their remarks,especially over something as silly as this.Your posts contents and the way you chop quotes and reply come off like you are trying to argue for arguments sake.It&#039;s entirely possible that I am wrong about this and we&#039;ll just have to chalk that up to the difference in the voice inflection of an actual conversation and the two dimensional typed word.I&#039;m not the only one who notices it.You are more than welcome to relate your experiences regarding the reliability of the different makes of handguns or even make blanket statements.I&#039;ll bet you dollars to doughnuts that I won&#039;t ask you to back them up.......not about this.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="J.P., post: 18084, member: 6"] I think you missed my point... We are certainly *all* welcome to disagree publicly. I'm not satisfied that "public good" was a good term either..."civil discourse"? Anyway,there's a difference in stating why you disagree with someone and asking them to qualify their remarks,especially over something as silly as this. Your posts contents and the way you chop quotes and reply come off like you are trying to argue for arguments sake. It's entirely possible that I am wrong about this and we'll just have to chalk that up to the difference in the voice inflection of an actual conversation and the two dimensional typed word.I'm not the only one who notices it. You are more than welcome to relate your experiences regarding the reliability of the different makes of handguns or even make blanket statements. I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that I won't ask you to back them up.......not about this. [/QUOTE]

Verification