Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Fear not they don't want to confiscate hunting rifles!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 4350384" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>From the Link:</p><p>According to attorney Joshua Perry, representing the Connecticut Attorney General’s office, the Second Amendment protects guns commonly used for self-defense, but not hunting rifles. As if there is a difference!? Perry’s arguments were made during a hearing at the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60887/gov.uscourts.ca2.60887.3.0.pdf" target="_blank">as part of a lawsuit filed by</a> the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) and a co-plaintiff, Toni Theresa Spera.</p><p></p><h3>The lawsuit challenges Connecticut’s restrictive gun control law passed after the Sandy Hook tragedy, which bans the sale of firearms classified as “assault weapons.”</h3><p></p><p></p><p>So, they want to ban "Assault weapons" that the normal public can't possess but the military can. </p><p>Ok, whatever, then you want to hunting rifles that are not capable of self defense?</p><p>Am I hearing a word salad of cameltoe harris?</p><p>I could go on for hours/pages about these stupid comments, but I'll spare you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 4350384, member: 5412"] From the Link: According to attorney Joshua Perry, representing the Connecticut Attorney General’s office, the Second Amendment protects guns commonly used for self-defense, but not hunting rifles. As if there is a difference!? Perry’s arguments were made during a hearing at the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60887/gov.uscourts.ca2.60887.3.0.pdf']as part of a lawsuit filed by[/URL] the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) and a co-plaintiff, Toni Theresa Spera. [HEADING=2]The lawsuit challenges Connecticut’s restrictive gun control law passed after the Sandy Hook tragedy, which bans the sale of firearms classified as “assault weapons.”[/HEADING] So, they want to ban "Assault weapons" that the normal public can't possess but the military can. Ok, whatever, then you want to hunting rifles that are not capable of self defense? Am I hearing a word salad of cameltoe harris? I could go on for hours/pages about these stupid comments, but I'll spare you. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Fear not they don't want to confiscate hunting rifles!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom