Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal appeals court rules that drug users can not be barred from owning guns.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigfug" data-source="post: 4091927" data-attributes="member: 4864"><p>Thats my point, nothing establishes any maximum allowable amount of THC or any maximum level of any drug that causes impairment. Its all officer discretion. Take a muscle relaxer, you're impaired, same as if you took a bottle of em. Any amount above 0% of pretty much anything could be construed as impairment. Doesn't matter how stoned you are, if you took a 10mcg gummy, or a 100mcg brownie, it's all the same in the eyes of the "law". And yes, there is a minimum BAC that applies to control of a motor vehicle, and while it may be ok to drive with a level of 0.02, an officer having a bad day might say that's too much to be carrying. The law is ambiguous, and could be construed to be like a minor in regards to alcohol. Anything above 0 is not legal. When the law does not establish a maximum, the minimum becomes the rule of thumb.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigfug, post: 4091927, member: 4864"] Thats my point, nothing establishes any maximum allowable amount of THC or any maximum level of any drug that causes impairment. Its all officer discretion. Take a muscle relaxer, you're impaired, same as if you took a bottle of em. Any amount above 0% of pretty much anything could be construed as impairment. Doesn't matter how stoned you are, if you took a 10mcg gummy, or a 100mcg brownie, it's all the same in the eyes of the "law". And yes, there is a minimum BAC that applies to control of a motor vehicle, and while it may be ok to drive with a level of 0.02, an officer having a bad day might say that's too much to be carrying. The law is ambiguous, and could be construed to be like a minor in regards to alcohol. Anything above 0 is not legal. When the law does not establish a maximum, the minimum becomes the rule of thumb. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal appeals court rules that drug users can not be barred from owning guns.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom