Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal Firearms Registry and 4473's
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="purplehaze" data-source="post: 720378" data-attributes="member: 6061"><p>In the strictest since, the goverment, requireing a person to submit a form or go through a background check and the sale being subject to the results is infringement. </p><p> However, over time and sometimes for popular causes the constitution is eroded. For instance the ban on automatic weapons is one of the more flaggrant debasing of our second amendment right. At the time the goverment used the turmoil of the time with a sensible argument on its face to forever restrict our right to own automatic firearms. </p><p> The background check is the sameway. The argument being that they dont want felons to own firearms and no one wants felons to own firearms. Sure seems like a common sense no brainer, of course felons shouldnt own firearms. Solution, have everyone in the nation that buys firearms subject to a background check. </p><p> Does that seem like a reasonable solution? Is there a less intrusive solution to this riddle?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="purplehaze, post: 720378, member: 6061"] In the strictest since, the goverment, requireing a person to submit a form or go through a background check and the sale being subject to the results is infringement. However, over time and sometimes for popular causes the constitution is eroded. For instance the ban on automatic weapons is one of the more flaggrant debasing of our second amendment right. At the time the goverment used the turmoil of the time with a sensible argument on its face to forever restrict our right to own automatic firearms. The background check is the sameway. The argument being that they dont want felons to own firearms and no one wants felons to own firearms. Sure seems like a common sense no brainer, of course felons shouldnt own firearms. Solution, have everyone in the nation that buys firearms subject to a background check. Does that seem like a reasonable solution? Is there a less intrusive solution to this riddle? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal Firearms Registry and 4473's
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom